HESI Exams: Health Education Systems, Inc

Health Education Systems, Inc or HESI exams are being given to nursing students more and more. These tests are given to students to evaluate two things. The first thing the test evaluates is how the program is working. The test is given to provide evidence so that the curriculum can be changed or modified if it needs to be. This paper looks in depth at the methods that the test uses to determine these two things. It also looks at the reliability of the HESI exams. If these tests are not working and the curriculum is changing because the test provides evidence to, than the curriculum may be changing for no apparent reason.
In just four years, the number of schools that administered that HESI exams rose from 85 to 565 or 565% [1]. The professors are becoming very concerned about the validity of the HESI exams. For most professors, they are not comfortable with putting trust into the exam and hoping that it is reliable and valid. The professors are also worried that these tests are changing the curriculum even if it does not need to be changed.

There are many exams that HESI provides. The entrance exam or HESI admission assessment exam, custom exams, specialty exams, and exit exams. A custom exam is a specialty exam designed to evaluate faculty-specified nursing content. A specialty exam is used to evaluate specific clinical content. The exit exam is a comprehensive ext exam and is available for registered nurses and practical nurses. There is also a RN-BSN exam that is used to measure RN’s pursuing a bachelor’s in nursing.

A problem-based remediation plan was developed and implemented to improve the clinical reasoning abilities and standardized test taking abilities of 9 students following 2 failures of the HESI exam. Prior to implementation students were assessed for learning needs, presence of anxiety, and learning styles. After completing the remediation sessions, all students successfully passes the HESI Exam with scores of 99.99.

When 9 junior students in our baccalaureate program failed to achieve a score of 85 on 2 attempts at exams developed by Health Education System, Inc (HESI), 1 a problem-based learning (PBL) remediation plan was designed and implemented to help these students improve their clinical reasoning abilities. Successfully completing the HESI exam is a progression requirement for advancement to the senior year. PBL teaches students to condense large amounts of information, develop critical thinking skills, and apply the information to a specific situation. 2 The remediation plan consisted of an assessment of student learning needs, review sessions, visualization and guided imagery, and a test-taking strategy session. The expectation was that with improved clinical reasoning these students would be more likely to pass the HESI on the third and final attempt and advance to the senior year.

Purpose of HESI Exams
HESI specialty exams were developed to assess students’ knowledge and their ability to apply nursing concepts within specific content areas. Faculties often use scores provided by these specialty exams as a substitute for teacher-made final exams. The E2 was developed to assess students’ preparedness for the licensing exam. Data provided by these exams can be useful in preparing self studies for accreditation that are required by accrediting agencies. The National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission (NLNAC)[2] and the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE)[3] require schools of nursing to demonstrate a systematic program evaluation. HESI Summary Reports provide content area scores that can be used to evaluate curricular strengths and weaknesses.[4] Because these exams provide interval-level data, the data can be analyzed using a variety of statistical methods. Since the E2 has demonstrated a high degree of accuracy in predicting outcomes of NCLEX-RN and NCLEX-PN,[4-7] nursing faculties are increasingly choosing to use E2 scores as benchmarks for progression and remediation.[8,9]

Description of Students
The students consisted of 3 men and 6 women who had no documented learning problems and who spoke English as their first language. The cumulative nursing grade point averages (GPAs) of students who passed the HESI exam on the first or second attempts ranged from 2.91 to 4.00 ( X = 3.38). The cumulative nursing GPAs of the 9 students who did not pass the HESI exam on the first or second attempts ranged from 2.24 to 3.37 ( X = 3.01).

Assessment of Students
Student assessment included reviewing individual students’ previous HESI exam reports to identify areas that needed improvement, talking with students to learn why they thought they failed the exam, and having a counselor meet with students to determine if test anxiety or other stressors interfered with their performance on the exam. In addition, students self-identified their individual learning style by reviewing information presented in the Test Taking Strategies booklet developed by Austin Community College. 3

Eight students were “sensing learners” and 1 student was an “intuitive learner.” According to Test Taking Strategies , 3 sensing learners and intuitive learners differ in the way they process information and in the way they approach test taking. Sensing learners focus on learning facts in a linear manner whereas intuitive learners focus on learning underlying principles or general ideas. Sensing learners scrutinize every word and phrase in a test question and may add inappropriate information to test questions that leads them to choose an incorrect response. Consequently, sensing learners generally use all the time allotted to finish a test.

In contrast, intuitive learners read test questions for a general idea and quickly select the first, often incorrect, response that occurs to them. Thus, intuitive learners finish tests in only a fraction of the time allotted. The intuitive learner was assigned the task of using a watch or clock to ensure that at least 1 minute was spent reading a test question and the choice of answers before selecting an answer. The 8 sensing learners were instructed not to add information to the questions and answers, but to answer the questions based on the situation presented.

Students provided the following reasons for their poor performance on the HESI exam: (a) inability to skip questions and return to these questions during the test, (b) lack of understanding of how to study for the exam, (c) the impression that all questions on the HESI exam had at least 3 correct answers, (d) lack of knowledge of how to take this type of test, (e) lack of trust in their own judgment, (f) stress and anxiety over taking a computerized test, (g) the presence of questions that asked for the initial, first, or most important nursing assessment or nursing intervention, and (h) the fact that the HESI exam covered areas not taught in the curriculum. In addition, students said it would be helpful to have a HESI exam expert available to teach strategies for taking the exam; and suggested that instructors in the nursing program take the HESI exam prior to administering it to students, to determine if any items had been keyed incorrectly.

At the end of the assessment phase each student was given a list of areas that needed improvement. The individual students’ lists were used to identify areas that were problematic for the entire group. The group review sessions addressed only those areas that were problems for all the students. Students were instructed to individually review areas not covered during the group remediation sessions.

Psychometric Properties of HESI Exams
Reliability

HESI determines the reliability of HESI exams by conducting an item analysis on each exam that is administered and returned to the company for a composite report of the aggregate data. Discrimination data are obtained for each test item by calculating a point biserial correlation coefficient. As a measure of the test’s overall reliability, a Kuder Richardson Formula 20 is calculated for every exam administered. Data obtained from these calculations are used to estimate the reliability of an exam prior to administration. These reliability estimates are based on all previous administrations of the test items on each exam and are reflective of the most recently updated item analysis. Reliability estimates are recalculated every time a HESI exam is scored, and they are updated concurrently on all exams that include any of the same test items. The estimated reliability coefficients for these HESI exams ranged from 0.86 to 0.99, and the number of times the items were used on these exams ranged from 180 to 47,320.

Validity
Research designed to quantify the degree of validity of all HESI exams is an ongoing process. The most current evidence of validity for various HESI exams is determined through an assessment of content validity, construct validity, and criterion-related validity as described in classical test theory.

Review Sessions
Three-hour review sessions were held 1 day per week for 4 weeks with a faculty facilitator. Each session began with a teacher-made test on the topic to be discussed in that session, followed by a lecture/discussion on the topic, a case study, and development of a nursing care plan based on the information in the case study. Topics included growth and development, antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum care. However, choice of topics should be guided by the areas that were identified to be problem areas for students.

When the initial test was completed, students were asked to give their responses and state why they thought their particular choice of answers was correct. After discussing the item, the correct answer was stated by the faculty facilitator. If a student had failed to answer the item correctly, he or she was asked to reread the question and identify any information that was overlooked or missed when the question was initially read. Students stated that this helped them to understand how they were failing to read test questions thoroughly or making incorrect inferences that were not applicable to the test item.
After the test, a lecture/discussion was held on the day’s topic, followed by presentation of the case study on that topic. The case study gave students an opportunity to plan care based on assessment information. Patient problems were identified and prioritized, nursing diagnoses were established, individualized short- and long-term goals were devised, and appropriate nursing interventions were developed. Thus, the review sessions emphasized clinical reasoning and critical thinking skills.

Visualization and Guided Imagery
All review sessions ended with 5 minutes dedicated to visualization and guided imagery designed to help people structure their thoughts by focusing on circumstances that make them feel comfortable. 4,5 Students were asked to close their eyes, take slow deep breaths, and to imagine that they were sitting at a computer and taking the HESI exam. They were instructed to visualize themselves as calm, realizing that they knew the information on which they would be tested. Next, students were asked to imagine themselves when they encountered a question that they initially thought was difficult. They were instructed to visualize themselves remaining calm, reading the question and choice of answers carefully, selecting the appropriate response, and proceeding to the next question. Finally, students were asked to visualize themselves completing the exam and seeing a score of 99.99 on the computer screen as their final score.

Test-taking Strategy Session
During the final week, students attended an additional 3.5-hour test-taking strategy session via telecommunication with a faculty facilitator from the main university campus. During this session students were taught test-wise test-taking strategies. When compared to students who are not test-wise, test-wise students approach tests in a more organized, logical, and thoughtful manner and are able to augment content knowledge with test-taking strategies to determine the correct test answers. 6 For example, students were taught how to incorporate therapeutic communication techniques with critical thinking skills to improve their ability to recognize the correct response when taking a test. In addition, students were instructed to use stress-relieving measures during test taking and to spend more time answering complex test questions and less time with easier ones. Finally, students were referred to the National Council of State Boards of Nursing, 7 and Kaplan International 8 Web sites for additional resources on test-taking strategies.

Scoring of HESI Exams
The HESI Predictability Model, a proprietary mathematical model, is used to calculate scores for HESI specialty exams and HESI exit exams. All scores provided by these HESI exams are based on the application of this model to the raw data. Test items are individually weighted based on their difficulty level, which is determined by dividing the number of correct responses to the item by the total number of responses to that item, thereby deriving a percentage of correct responses to the item. Each HESI specialty exam and HESI exit exam also provides a conversion score. This score is presented as a percentage that reflects the average weight of all the test items on an exam and the average weight of the test items answered correctly. Therefore, this conversion score is a weighted percentage score that faculty can include as a part of the student’s final course grade.

Low-scoring Students
In year II, data were collected and analyzed regarding low-scoring E 2 students’ outcomes on the NCLEX. Significantly more of the year II low-scoring students failed the licensing examination in both the RN and the PN groups than did the high-scoring students who were predicted to pass the examination. 31 In year III, 52 (2.36%) of the 2,206 high-scoring RN students and 2 (0.88%) of the 228 high-scoring PN students failed the NCLEX, whereas 144 (48.81%) of the 295 low-scoring RN students and 20 (30.77%) of the 65 low-scoring PN students failed the NCLEX. Again in year III, significantly more low-scoring students failed the NCLEX than did high-scoring students who were predicted to pass ([chi] 2 = 818.775, P = .001).

Results
Prior to implementation of the review plan, these students’ HESI scores ranged from 60.27 to 83.61. After implementing the remediation plan, all 9 students made 99.99 on the HESI exam and progressed to the senior year. During the last review session, students were asked what needed to be added or changed in the remediation plan for future students. All 9 said nothing needed to be added or changed. Students reported that the test-taking strategy session helped them to develop a comprehensive approach to taking standardized tests and enabled them to use critical thinking and anxiety-reducing skills more effectively.

Attendance at the review sessions was not mandatory. Three students attended all sessions but the remaining 6 students missed at least 1 session during the 4 weeks. When a student was absent, copies of all materials were mailed to the student. Thus, students were not penalized because of work schedules or family emergencies.

Conclusion
These students were able to successfully pass a customized HESI exam. Implementation of a faculty-facilitated remediation plan helped students focus on their individual learning styles, and develop strategies to overcome the inherent difficulties of their particular learning style. In addition, students were able to develop strategies to improve their critical thinking and improve skills in taking computerized tests.

In the midst of declining student enrollment in the nation’s schools of nursing, declining NCLEX pass rates, and a shrinking nursing workforce, success for first-time NCLEX candidates remains a top priority for nursing faculties. Based on the data obtained from this study, as well as from the previous two studies, the E 2 has been determined to be highly accurate in predicting NCLEX success. Because it is a computerized examination, results are obtained immediately and can serve as a benchmark for remediation to assist candidates in becoming successful first-time takers of the NCLEX. Success on the licensure examination enables the candidates to enter the workforce, thereby helping to ameliorate the nursing shortage. Though no significant difference was found in NCLEX-RN pass rates of the year III low-scoring students who were remediated and those who were not remediated, further research is needed to determine which E 2 implementation strategies are most effective in improving NCLEX pass rates.

References
1. HESI. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Nursing: Customized Exam . Houston, Tex: Author; 2003. [Context Link]

2. Amos E, White MJ. Problem-based learning. Nurs Educ . 1998;23(2):11-14. [Context Link]

3. Austin Community College. Test taking strategies . Available at: http://www2.austin.cc.tx.us/adnlev2/Tutoring_Web/Documents/Testtaking.htm . Accessed April 15, 2004. [Context Link]

4. Fortinash KM, Holoday-Worret PA. Psychiatric mental health nursing . St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2000. [Context Link]

5. Murray SS, McKinney ES, Gorrie TM. Foundations of maternal-newborn nursing . Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002. [Context Link]

6. Yang P. Effects of Test-Wiseness Upon Performance on the Test of English as a Foreign Language . [dissertation]. Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta; 2001. [Context Link]

7. National Council of State Boards of Nursing. NCSBN learning extension . Available at: http://www.learningtext.com/students . Accessed June 10, 2003. [Context Link]

8. Kaplan International. Strategy sessions . Available at: http://www.kaptest.com/repository/templates/Lev5InitDroplet.jhtml?lev5Parent=/www/KapTest/docs/repository/content/Nursing/NCLEX/Practice_Lab/strategy_Sessions&ProductId . Accessed June 10, 2003. [Context Link]
phone: 800.950.2728 fax: 713.838.0079 email: info@hesitest.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


six − 1 =